Leo today in the online edition of The Spectator the following sentences, for to an article about the actress Kathy Saenz:
"It's noon. It's August. His son Amador enters the garden today. Her husband, actor Sebastian Martínez wants to take, by any means. Hours before have a bomb in Bogotá. Kathy is radiant. Come strawberries. "
The bold, the particular score, everything belongs to the original text. Normally, I resign myself silent and not protest but this time I could not stay silent. Okay, who wrote the article wants to sound modern, why not a little intellectual game with short sentences and disconnected. All right. It also lets talk in the article, the therapist helps Kathy to "resolve their farts" vocabulary not bother an opinion column of a young carefree or verbatim transcript of an answer given orally but frankly grind, even if what she said (I reserve my comments to this chocolocura), to put it in a paragraph narrative intended to be published in a newspaper. But hey, that happened to me but someone explain to me the sequence of ideas and, above all, why the bomb refencia to Bogotá. I know that the dramatic incident took place that day but what to do with what is being told. Do so Sebastián Martinez wants to take his son to the garden?, "Fears for him? However, how can that be true so Kathy is radiant and eat strawberries? Put these sentences one after another just lends itself to misunderstandings, especially the image say it so loud and lazy eating her strawberries after the pump, as usual.
I know it was the intention of the article and it would seem fair to judge Kathy Saenz for him, no more missing, but can not help thinking that this article reads superficial and banal that one for anything, burn a few minutes, serves example to illustrate the vast gulf that exists in the country between what happens and the reaction of many residents in this regard.
0 comments:
Post a Comment